NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Rose [2004] NSWCCA 326 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1, 43, 45; Barr J at 44; Hoeben J at 2 DECISION : Crown appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Crown appeal principles - sentencing discretion - rehabilitation. Court of Criminal Appeal Act, 1912 - s5D,s11 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act, 1900 - s112(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999, ss11,33 Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Dealers Act, 1996 - s24 AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 at [19] R v Howard [2001] NSWCCA 309 at [18] CASES CITED : R v KM & Ors [2004] NSWCCA 65 at [33] R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Thomson & Houlten (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Wall (2002] NSWCCA 42 at [70] PARTIES : Crown - Applicant Robert Matthew Rose - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1856; 60264/04 COUNSEL : GIO Rowling - Applicant Crown Ms H Cox - Respondent SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown S O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 04/11/0023 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ainslie-Wallace DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2004/1856 60264/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate