NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 60 NSWLR 108 146 A Crim R 179
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Le [2004] NSWCCA 82 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Hulme J at 56; Adams J at 81 DECISION : The questions posted in the stated case should be answered - (1) No; (2) No: (3) Yes.
CATCHWORDS : Listening devices - microphone transmitting to recording device - whether microphone alone a listening device - interpretation of Listening Devices Act 1984. D Barbaro v Director of Public Prosecutions (1999) 49 NSWLR 68 (O'Keefe J); (2001) 51 NSWLR 419 (CA); Beckwith v R (1976) 135 CLR 569; Miller v TCN Channel 9 (1988) 36 A Crim R 92; CASES CITED : Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69; R v Adams (1935) 53 CLR 563; R v Giaccio (1977) 93 A Crim R 462; Steiner Wilson & Webster Pty Ltd v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (2000) Aust Torts Reports 81-537; PARTIES : Regina v Marion Rose Le FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60453/02 COUNSEL : P Byrne SC & S Kaur-Bains - Appellant D C Frearson - Crown SOLICITORS : Jackson Smith - Appellant S E O'Connor - Crown
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 02/12/0488; DC 02/12/0602 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Morgan DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA60453/02 DC 02/12/0488 DC 02/12/0602
GILES JA HULME J ADAMS J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate