NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 137 A Crim R 557
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Bradley Scott Burns [2003] NSWCCA 30 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 February 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Sully J at 5; Buddin J at 91 DECISION : Appeal against conviction allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; new trial ordered
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Reg. v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50 Fernando (1992) 72 A Crim R 58 Fernando (2002) NSWCCA 28 R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155 CASES CITED : R v Hasenkamp, CCA unreported, 24 February 1998 R v McGoldrick, CCA unreported, 28 April 1998 R v RPS, CCA unreported, 13 Augusut 1997 Stanoevski v The Queen (2001) 202 CLR 115 Palmer v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1 V (1998) 100 A Crim R 448 Mraz v The Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493 PARTIES : Regina Bradley Scott Burns FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60832/01 COUNSEL : L. Lamprati - Crown H. Dhanji - Appellant SOLICITORS : S. E. O'Connor - Crown D. J. Humphreys - Appellant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/61/0038 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nield DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60832/01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate