NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Roberts [2003] NSWCCA 67 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 1; Shaw J at 33 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act s 97(1) Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Challis [2003] NSWCCA 48 CASES CITED : R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516 R v Hayes [2001] NSWCCA 410 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 PARTIES : Regina v Grant John Roberts FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60216/02 COUNSEL : R.A. Hulme SC (Crown) L. Flannery (Applicant) SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor (Crown) D.J. Humphreys (Applicant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/21/0244 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nield DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60216/02
STUDDERT J SHAW J
Friday 21 March 2003 REGINA v GRANT JOHN ROBERTS Judgment 1 STUDDERT J: The applicant, Grant John Roberts, seeks leave to appeal against sentences imposed upon him by Nield DCJ in the District Court on 11 April 2002. The sentences that were imposed followed the applicant's trial on three counts of armed robbery. The jury acquitted the applicant on one of the counts, but found him guilty on the remaining two counts. 2 In respect of the offences to which those two counts related, the applicant was sentenced following conviction as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate