NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Donovan [2003] NSWCCA 324 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/09/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J at 1; Greg James J at 1; Smart AJ at 31 DECISION : Appeal dismissed by majority.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW: - sentence - escape, aggravated robbery (2), deemed larceny motor vehicle (2) - Crown appeal in respect of robbery sentences - whether manifestly inadequate - whether justified by respondent's limited role - whether sentences should have been concurrent - whether Henry guideline applicable LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 R v Dickson [2002] NSWCCA 327 R v Fernando (1992) 76 ACrimR 58 CASES CITED : R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Murchie (1999) 108 ACrimR 482 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 PARTIES : Regina - Appellant Horace James Donovan - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60261/03 COUNSEL : D Howard - Crown D Stewart - Respondent SOLICITORS : CK Smith - Crown R Hill - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/11/0631 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Woods DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60261/03
HIDDEN J GREG JAMES J SMART AJ
Friday 7 November 2003 REGINA v Horace James DONOVAN Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate