NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 144 A Crim R 67
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ambrosi [2004] NSWCCA 23 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/02/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; O'Keefe J at 2; Whealy J at 3 DECISION : The appellant's appeal against conviction be dismissed; and that leave be granted in relation to his application for leave to appeal against sentence; but that the appeal itself be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Accomplices - when they should give evidence - Accomplices - warning - scope of re-examination - prior consistent statements - lies as consequences of guilt - directions - Henry guideline judgment - parity with co-offender. Crimes Act NSW LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 R v Booth (1982) 2 NSWLR 847 at 849-850 R v Sullivan (2003) NSWCCA 100 at para 95 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301 at 306, 309 (310) and 334 R v Yammine and Chami (2002) NSWCCA 289 R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442 at 448-450; 482-483; 485B-486B CASES CITED : Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 at 210-211 R v Dellapratona (1993) 31 NSWLR 123 at 150 R v Henry & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Zamagias (2002) NSWCCA 17 R v Rutter (2003) NSWCCA 306 Postiglione v The Queen (1996) 189 CLR 295 at 301 The Queen v Lucas [1981] QB 720 PARTIES : Regina v Gary Esteve Ambrosi FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60358/03 COUNSEL : Mr D. Howard - Crown Mr G. Farmer - Appellant SOLICITORS : DDP - Crown Jeffreys & Associates - Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate