NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Muriniti v Lyons [2004] NSWSC 135 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J DECISION : Appeal allowed - extensions of time granted - determination of Costs Assessor set aside - directions for further conduct of proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - costs - assessment of - liability for costs in dispute - powers of Costs Assessor - extension of time to appeal etc - relevance of delay - WORDS and PHRASES - "assessor". Legal Profession Act 1987 ss 201, 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, Legal Profession Reform Act 1993 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Regulation 1994 cl 26A Patents Act 1952 (Cth) s 20 SCR Pt 51A r 3 Adams v Kennick Trading (International) Ltd (1986) 4 NSWLR 503 Baker v Kearney [2002] NSWSC 746 Chapmans Limited v Yandells [1999] NSWCCA 361 Cohen v McWilliam (1995) 38 NSWLR 476 CASES CITED : Evans v Bartlam [1937] AC 473 Floyd v Lyons [1897] 1 Ch 633 Lace v Younan [1999] NSWSC 1072 Muriniti v Lyons & Ors [2000] NSWSC 680 Ryan v Hansen [2000] NSWSC 354, 49 NSWLR 184 Rowe v Australian United Steam Navigation Co Ltd (1909) 9 CLR 1 PARTIES : Leonardo Carlo Muriniti v Janice Lyons FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20210/01; 10315/03 COUNSEL : J R Dupree - Plaintiff E A Cohen - Defendant SOLICITORS : L C Muriniti & Associates - Plaintiff
- 21 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate