NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) Aust Contract Reports 90-197 (2004) ATPR (Digest) 46-249
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Webster v Havyn Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 227 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 to 25 March, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Declaration that Plaintiff validly rescinded contract for sale; deposit to be repaid under s.55(2A) Conveyancing Act; Defendant's Cross Claim for damages for misrepresentation/misleading or deceptive conduct dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - SALE OF LAND - TIME OF ESSENCE - MISREPRESENTATION - contract for sale of land alleged to have been procured by vendor's misrepresentation as to floor area of building - purchaser affirmed contract after discovering alleged misrepresentation - purchaser unable to find purchase money in time for completion - whether vendor not entitled to rescind in reliance upon notice to complete by reason of original misrepresentation inducing contract. - HELD: Vendor validly rescinded - MISREPRESENTATION - Vendor's agent states in flyer approximate floor area of flats - qualifications at foot of both pages of flyer to the effect that measurements believed correct but could not be guaranteed and person should make own enquiries - whether statements as to area could be read in isolation from rest of document - whether representation made as to floor area or as to belief - CAUSATION - Defendant proposed costly redevelopment of building - relied on statement in flyer as to approximate floor area without paying attention to statements that measurements could not be guaranteed and that people should make own enquiries - Defendant made no enquiries - whether Defendant's loss caused by misrepresentation or by Defendant's failure to take sufficient care for its own interests - DEPOSIT - FORFEITURE - contract validly rescinded by vendor - forfeited deposit more than twice vendor's loss suffered on resale - hardship to purchaser - whether relief should be granted under s.55(2A) Conveyancing Act. Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) - s.55(2A) LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) - s.42 Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW) - Louis Dreyfus & Cie v Parnaso Cia Naviara SA (The Dominator) [1960] 2 QB 49 - Elders Trustee and Executor Co Ltd v E.G. Reeves Pty Ltd (1987) 78 ALR 193 - Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 - Hasanovic v Polistena [1982] NSW Conv R 55-078 - Lubidineuse v Bevanere Pty Ltd (1984) 3 FCR 1 CASES CITED : - Lucas & Tait (Investments) Pty Ltd v Victoria Securities Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 268 - O'Brien v Smolonogov (1983) 53 ALR 107 - Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D1 - Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 -Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 77 ALJR 1853 - Wilson v Kingsgate Mining Industries Pty Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 713 PARTIES : Renata Marina Paola Webster - Plaintiff Havyn Pty Ltd - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5941/02 COUNSEL : R.W. Tregenza - Plaintiff J. Merkel - Defendant SOLICITORS : Biddulph & Salenger - Plaintiff Whittens - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate