NSW Caselaw
50 ACSR 402 Reported Decision : 60 NSWLR 696 (2005) 23 ACLC 34
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : FUJI XEROX AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v TOLCHER & ORS [2004] NSWCA 284 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 August 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1, 18; Sheller JA at 16; Tobias JA at 17 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - Priorities in winding up - Meaning of "in any winding up" in s564 Corporations Act Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Companies (Unclaimed Assets and Moneys) Act 1963 (NT) Energy and Resource Conservation Co Limited (In Liquidation) v Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited (1997) 41 NSWLR 169 CASES CITED : Day and Dent Constructions Pty limited v North Australian Properties Pty Limited (1982) 150 CLR 85 BP Australia Ltd v Brown (2003) 58 NSWLR 322 Fuji Xerox Australit Pty Limited PARTIES : Raymond George Tolcher National Australia Bank Limited Capital Finance Australia Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40139/04 J T Johnson (Appellant) COUNSEL : J Stoljar (Second Respondent) M Ashhurst (Third Respondent) Bartier Perry (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Piper Alderman (First Respondent) Malleson Stephen Jaques (Second Respondent) Kemp Strang (Third Respondent)
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 3259/03 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Barrett J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate