NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Glaister [2004] NSWCCA 244 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Sperling J at 2; Adams J at 57 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Crown appeal against sentence - no question of principle LEGISLATION CITED : Firearms Act 1996, s7, s51, s66 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, s7 PARTIES : Regina John Harwood Glaister FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60205/04 COUNSEL : Ms J Girdham for the Crown Mr R Hulme SC for the Respondent SOLICITORS : Director of Public Prosecutions Legal Aid Commission for the Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/11/0609 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Goldring DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60205/04
Sheller JA Sperling J Adams J
Thursday, 22 July 2004 Regina v John Harwood Glaister Judgment 1 Sheller JA: I agree with Sperling J. 2 Sperling J: This is a Crown appeal against sentence. 3 The respondent was sentenced by Goldring DCJ on 16 April 2004. He had pleaded guilty to three offences committed on 7 March 2002, namely:
Count 1: sold a firearm namely a Smith and Wesson .38 calibre revolver to an undercover police operative using the assumed name of Danny and the said Danny was not authorised to possess the firearm by a licence or permit, contrary to section 51(1) of the Firearms Act 1996. The maximum prescribed penalty is imprisonment for 5 years.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate