NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : The Protective Commissioner v "D" & Ors (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 477 HEARING DATE(S) : Written submissions JUDGMENT DATE : 21 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 2; McColl JA at 3 DECISION : (1) Costs order made in Protective Commissioner (No 1) set aside. (2) Protective Commissioner to pay the second respondents' costs of Protective Commissioner (No 1) on a common fund basis. (3) No order as to the Protective Commissioner's costs.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - PROTECTED ESTATES - Case involving matter of general importance concerning Protective Commissioner's powers. LEGISLATION CITED : Protected Estates Act 1983 (NSW) s 12, s 28(1)(b) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 76 r 5(3) Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd (1991) 100 ALR 568; (1991) ATPR 41-114 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1991) 22 NSWLR 1 Holt and Another v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 M v K (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, 24 April 1989, Powell J, BC8902256) CASES CITED : New South Wales Medical Defence Union Ltd v Crawford (1993) 31 NSWLR 469 The Protective Commissioner v "D" & Ors [2004] NSWCA 216 Re an Incapable Person D [1983] 2 NSWLR 590 Re B [2000] NSWSC 44 RH v CAH and Others [1984] 1 NSWLR 694 The Protective Commissioner (Applicant) PARTIES : "D" (First Respondent) Ors (Second Respondents) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40892/03 S W Balafoutis (Applicant) COUNSEL : First respondent (No appearance) D Marks (Second respondents) Timothy John Tunbridge (Applicant) SOLICITORS : First respondent (No appearance) McBride Harle & Martin (Second respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate