NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Wentworth v. Rogers & Anor. [2004] NSWCA 430 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 and 6 October 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Santow JA at 97; Hislop J at 98 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING - Fraudulent conveyances - Deed by husband acknowledging debt to wife, and associated mortgage over husband's property - Whether fraudulent as against prospective creditor - Whether wife a purchaser in good faith - Onus of proof LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s.37A Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) s.121 Abignano v. Wenkart (1998) 9 BPR 16,765 Calverley v. Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Cannane v. J. Cannane Pty. Ltd. (1998) 192 CLR 557 Glegg v Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474 CASES CITED : Huynh v. Helleh Holdings Pty. Ltd. [2001] NSWSC 1162 Lloyds Bank Ltd. v Marcan [1973] 1 WLR 1387 Michael v. Thompson (1894) 20 VLR 548 Middleton v. Pollock [1876] 2 Ch.D. 104 P.T. Garuda Indonesia Ltd. v. Grellman (1992) 35 FCR 515 Williams v. Lloyd (1934) 50 CLR 341 Katherine Wentworth - appellant PARTIES : Gordon J. Rogers - 1st respondent Toni Rogers - 2nd respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40474/03 COUNSEL : Mr. S. Robb QC with Ms. V. Culkoff for the appellant Mr. R. Lovas for the 2nd respondent Russo & Partners, Arcadia for appellant SOLICITORS : Beazley Singleton, Sydney for 1st respondent Dorrough Smart, Sydney for 2nd respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate