NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Alstom Australia Ltd v NAP Acoustics Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 217 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Order for summary dismissal under Part 13 rule 5 dismissed
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - summary dismissal - application by one of two defendants - separate breaches of different contracts pleaded - time for filing evidence expired - no evidence against second defendant LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Part 13 rule 5 Breheny v Cairncross [2002] NSWCA 69 Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Waugh (1988) 14 NSWLR 360 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hummerstone v Leary [1921] 2 KB 664 CASES CITED : James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1986) 64 ALR 347 Menzies v Australian Iron and Steel Ltd (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 62 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Rajski v Powell (1987) 11 NSWLR 522 Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 Alstom Australia Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : NAP Acoustics Pty Limited t/as NAP Silentflo - First Defendant Process Machinery Australia Pty Limited t/as DCL Engineering - Second Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55056/02 COUNSEL : Mr S T White - Plaintiff Mr K N Gye - Second Defendant SOLICITORS : Ebsworth & Ebsworth - Plaintiff A R Conolly & Company - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate