NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 60 NSWLR 86
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v Bilal SKAF, REGINA v Mohammed SKAF [2004] NSWCCA 37 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 and 5 November 2003 25 and 31 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 1 DECISION : Conviction quashed; new trial ordered; sentence adjusted.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sexual offences - identification issues - Evidence Act, s116 - rule 4 - directions as to meaning of "beyond reasonable doubt" - impact of media publicity upon fair trial - directions about suspect's refusal to answer questions in ERISP - directions about lies - consciousness of guilt directions - complainant's evidence as to belief of accused's guilt in matter involving inference - juror misconduct - unauthorised view and experiment - admissibility of evidence of same - appropriate directions to juries prohibiting independent enquiries (D) Evidence Act, ss53, 76, 78, 89, 95, 97, 101, 116 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000, s13 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s59 Jury Act 1977, ss68, 68A Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 77 ALJR 1433 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Ellis v Deheer [1922] 2 KB 113 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28 Kozul v The Queen (1981) 147 CLR 221 R v Adamson NSWCCA, 26 November 1992) R v Amyouni NSWCCA, 18 February 1988 R v Andrew Brown (1907) 7 SR(NSW) 290 R v Astill NSWCCA, 17 July 1992 R v Ball [1961] SR(NSW) 37 R v Bates [1985] 1 NZLR 326 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Chami, M Skaf, Ghanem, B Skaf & Ors [2004] NSWCCA 36 R v Domican (No 3) (1990) 46 A Crim R 428 R v Emmett (1988) 14 NSWLR 327 R v Woolcott Forbes (1944) SR(NSW) 332 R v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 R v Gillespie (unreported, Court of Appeal, NZ, 7 February 1989 R v Herring NSWCCA, 29 November 1998 R v Inamata [2003] NSWCCA 19 R v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174 R v K [2003] NSWCCA 406 CASES CITED : R v Lewis [2003] NSWCCA 332 R v Locchi (1991) 22 NSWLR 309 R v Marshall (2000) 113 A Crim R 190 R v Marsland NSWCCA 17 July 1991 R v Maund, NSWCCA, 16 December 1993 R v Miah (1997) 2 Cr App R 12 R v Minarowska and Koziol (1995) 83 A Crim R 78 R v Mirza [2004] 2 WLR 201 R v Neilan [1992] 1 VR 57 R v Pan [2001] 2 SCR 344 R v Quinn [1962] 2 QB 245 R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 R v Rinaldi and Kessy (1993) 30 NSWLR 605 at 610-11 R v Rudkowsky NSWCCA,15 December 1992 R v Bilal Skaf, Mohamed Ghanem, Belal Hajeid [2004] NSWCCA 74 R v Southammavong [2003] NSWCCA 312 R v Tayyab Sheikh [2004] NSWCCA 38 R v Young [1995] 2 QB 324 Re Mathews and Ford (1973) VR 199 Re Portillo [1997] 2 VR 723 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650 The Queen v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 TKWJ v R (2002) 193 ALR 7 Vaise v Delaval (1785) 1 TR 11, 99 ER 944 Zoneff v The Queen (2000) 200 CLR 234 REGINA PARTIES : Bilal SKAF Mohammed SKAF FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60401/03; 60414/03 Crown: D Arnott/ G Smith Appellant: (B Skaf) P Zahra SC/ A Cook COUNSEL : Appellant: (M Skaf) S Odgers SC/ H Danji Amici curiae: R Cogswell SC/ M G Sexton SC/ J A Quilter Crown: S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions) SOLICITORS : Appellant: (B Skaf) Galloways Appellant: (M Skaf) W H O'Brien
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate