NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Siev v. Magid [2004] NSWCA 135 revised - 06/05/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 and 27 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Hodgson JA at 28; Stein AJA at 129 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - Interpretation - Extrinsic evidence - Breach - Whether justifying termination - Recovery of money paid - Whether payment conditional or unconditional - Total failure of consideration. Baltic Shipping Co. v. Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 Commonwealth Securities Ltd. v. South Pacific Pty. Ltd. [2003] NSWCA 199 CASES CITED : David Securities Pty. Ltd. v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Heckenberg v. Delaforce [2000] NSWCA 137 Rawson v. Hobbs (1961) 107 CLR 466 Saunders v. Vautier (1841) Cr & Ph 240, 41 ER 482 PARTIES : Dan Siev - appellant Robert Magid - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40688/03 COUNSEL : Mr. R. Ellicott QC with Mr. J. Robson for appellant Mr. D. Hammerschlag SC with Ms. E. Frizell for respondent SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt for appellant Blake Dawson Waldron for respondent
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Equity Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT ED 50135/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Macready AJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40688/03 ED 50135/01
MASON P HODGSON JA STEIN AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate