NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Josef Mioduszewski [2004] NSWCCA 154 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Grove J at 1; Dunford J at 2; Howie J at 40 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Sentencing - malicious wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm - non-parole period - special circumstances - CRIMINAL LAW - Sentencing - appeal - admissibility - evidence showing deterioration in prisoner's condition since sentencing Crimes Act 1900 s 33 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1999 Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525 R v Ashton (2002) 137 A Crim R 73 R v Bailey (1988) 35 A Crim R 458 R v B E G [2001] NSWCCA 341 R v Bradley [2004] NSWCCA 88 R v Ehrenburg (unrep - CCA - 14 December 1990) CASES CITED : R v Jenkins (unrep - CCA - 14 July 1993) R v Jones (1993) 70 A Crim R 449 R v Keir [2004] NSWCCA 106 R v M A [2004] NSWCCA 92 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534, 53 NSWLR 704 R v Spagnolo (2000) 114 A Crim R 98 R v Vachalec [1981] 1 NSWLR 351 PARTIES : Regina v Josef Mioduszewski FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60520/03 COUNSEL : E Wilkins (Crown) S J Odgers SC (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Crown) Legal Aid Commission (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate