NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wasada Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (No.2) [2003] NSWSC 987 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 December 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Restitution not available
CATCHWORDS : RESTITUTION - general principles - not a cause of action - need for "injustice" which is an element in restitution to be within a recognised category or a new category justifiable by legal reasoning - need to plead facts demonstrating such a category - no such facts pleaded - factual matters actually relied on by plaintiff to establish a restitutionary claim not made out LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159 CASES CITED : Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall (2001) 208 CLR 516 Torpey Vander Have Pty Ltd v Mass Constructions Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 263; (2002) 55 IPR 542 Wasada Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2003] NSWSC 894 PARTIES : Wasada Pty Limited - Plaintiff State Rail Authority of New South Wales - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3089/03 COUNSEL : T Hale SC - Plaintiff C Frawley, solicitor - Defendant SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang - Plaintiff Henry Davis York - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EQUITY LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate