NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sharon Y Eubanks, being the person nominated by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in proceedings United States of America v Phillip Morris Incorporated et al Civil Action No.99-CV-2496 (GK), for the purposes of applying for orders under section 33 of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995 [2003] NSWSC 386 HEARING DATE(S) : 1/5/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1 DECISION : Motion dismissed; Applicant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion
Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence on Commission Act 1995 Evidence (Evidence on Commission) Amendment Act 1988 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Goldmines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd (2001) 105 FCR 136 The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 Forsyth; Re Cordova v Philips Roxane Laboratories Inc (1984) 2 NSWLR 327 In the Will of Sheppard [1972] 2 NSWLR 714 Lenning v Alexander Proudfoot Company World Headquarters (unreported) NSWCA, 22 April 1991 McCabe v British American Tobacco Australian Services Ltd [2002] VSC 73 CASES CITED : National Australia Bank Ltd v Idoport Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 8 National Mutual Holdings Pty Limited v The Sentry Corporation (unreported) FCA, 30 May 1990 Newcastle City Council v Kern Land Pty Ltd (unreported) NSWSC, 9 December 1996 NSW Commissioner of Police v Tuxford [2002] NSWCA 139 Pickles v Gratzon [2002] NSWSC 688 Principal Registrar of the Supreme Court v Ali Tastan (1994) 75 A Crim R 498 Schutt v Queenan [2000] NSWCA 341 Southern Pacific Hotel Services Inc v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 710 Westpac Banking Corp v Abemond Pty Ltd (unreported) NSWSC, 28 October 1994 PARTIES : Sharon Y Eubanks, being the person nominated by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in proceedings United States of America v Phillip Morris Incorporated et al Civil Action No.99-CV-2496 (GK), for the purposes of applying for orders under section 33 of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13177/02 COUNSEL : Dr Bell (Plaintiff/Respondent) Mr M.R. Speakman / Ms K. Richardson (Applicant) SOLICITORS : Ebsworth & Ebsworth (Plaintiff/Respondent) Gilbert & Tobin (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate