NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Randell and McAlister [2004] NSWCCA 337 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/9/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Kirby J at 42; Buddin J at 43 DECISION : MCALISTER: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. The appeal against sentence be allowed; 3. The sentence below be quashed, and in lieu thereof the Applicant be sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months to date from 21 October 2003 and to expire on 20 April 2006, and to a balance of the term of the sentence of 1 year 6 months, equivalent to an overall term of 4 years to date from 21 October 2003. 4. The earliest date on which the Applicant would be eligible for release on parole would accordingly be 20 April 2006. RANDELL: 1. Application for leave to appeal be granted; 2. The appeal be allowed; 3. The sentence below be quashed; 4. In lieu thereof the Applicant be sentenced to a non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months commencing on 8 May 2003 and expiring on 7 November 2006, and to a balance of the term of the sentence of 1 year 9 months constituting a total term of 5 years and 3 months to date from 8 May 2003; 5.On that basis the earliest date on which he would be eligible for release on parole would be 7 November 2006.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against severity of sentence - robbery while armed with an offensive weapon - plea of guilty. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 98 A Crim R 134 R v Bavadra (2000) 115 A Crim R 152 R v Cimone (2001) 121 A Crim R 433 R v Crowley [2004] NSWCCA 256 R v Doorey [2000] NSWCCA 456 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 CASES CITED : R v Hutchison [2000] NSWCCA 113 R v Knight [2002] NSWCCA 12 R v Kurtic (1996) 85 A Crim R 57 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Randall NSWCCA 19 April 1994 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 Regina v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Trevenna [2004] NSWCCA 43 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343 Regina PARTIES : Luke Anthony Randell Mark Bradley McAlister FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1914; 2004/1719 B. Knox (Crown) COUNSEL : G Graham (Randell) I Lloyd QC (McAlister) SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh S E O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate