NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 141 A Crim R 531
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v STANBOULI [2003] NSWCCA 355 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Hulme J at 6; Carruthers AJ at 171 DECISION : Crown appeal allowed; Sentences imposed by Shadbolt DCJ quashed; In lieu thereof the Respondent be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of nineteen years to date from 27 July 2001 and to expire on 26 July 2020 with a non-parole period of twelve years to date from 27 July 2001 and to expire on 26 July 2013; Direct the Solicitor for the Respondent to explain to the Respondent, as required by s16F of the Crimes Act, the sentence and the purpose and consequences of the non-parole period.
PARTIES : Regina Simon Stanbouli FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60509/02 COUNSEL : Crown: RF Sutherland SC Respondent: J Dailly SC SOLICITORS : Crown: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Respondent: Walter Madden Jenkins
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Shadbolt DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 52 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60509/02
SPIGELMAN CJ HULME J CARRUTHERS AJ
Thursday, 4 December 2003 R v Simon STANBOULI Judgment 1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I have read the judgments of Hulme J and Carruthers AJ in draft. Subject to one matter, I agree with the reasons of Hulme J and the head sentence he proposes.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate