NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Reynolds [2004] NSWCCA 51 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; Simpson J at 2; Barr J at 58 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Crown appeal - asserted manifest inadequacy of sentence - robbery being armed with an offensive weapon - plea of guilty - subjective circumstances - error of fact or law or procedure - protective custody - planning as an aggravating factor - need not greed as the motivating factor - delay Crimes Act 1901 (NSW) s94, s97 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Part 3, Division 3, s21A, s44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s5D Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Cranssen (1936) 55 CLR 509 R v Durocher-Yvon [2003] NSWCCA 299 CASES CITED : R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Reynolds [1999] NSWCCA 238, unreported, 16 August 1999 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 28 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207 R v Whittaker (1928) 41 CLR 230 PARTIES : Crown - Appellant Wayne Bradley Reynolds - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60355/03; 60037/04 COUNSEL : D Arnott - Crown RJ Buttons - Respondent SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown S O'Connor - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/31/0419 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Williams DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate