NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : John Rondo v State of New South Wales [2004] NSWSC 265 HEARING DATE(S) : 31 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : Traffic Law - offences - infringement notices - due service - enforcement orders - annulment of - proceedings for declaration - discretion Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED : Fines Act 1996 Road Transport (General) Act 1999 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cain v Glass (No 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230 Currabubula v State Bank of New South Wales [2000] NSWSC 232 Erceg v District Court of New South Wales [2003] NSWCA 379 CASES CITED : Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 Johnco Nominees Pty Limited v Albury-Wodonga (NSW) Corporation [1977] 1 NSWLR 43 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 Shapowloff v Dunn [1973] 2 NSWLR 468 PARTIES : John Rondo v State of New South Wales FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10568/04 COUNSEL : In person - Plaintiff A G J Foel - Defendant SOLICITORS : In person - Plaintiff I V Knight - Defendant
- 5 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
DUNFORD J
WEDNESDAY 31 MARCH 2004
10568/04 JOHN RONDO v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: In these proceedings, the plaintiff, John Rondo, seeks a declaration that the making of enforcement orders numbered 236425167, 236253221 and 237681161 by the defendant are unlawful, and/or ultra vires.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate