NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : SYMSS v THE QUEEN [2003] NSWCCA 77 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 February 2003 28 February 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 April 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; James J at 121; Smart AJ at 122 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Procedure - Trial of two co-accused - Murder - Cut-throat defence - Whether separate trials should have been ordered LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Fernando (1999) NSWCCA 66 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414 Ignjatic (1993) 68 A Crim R 333 Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 R v Middis (unreported) NSWCCA 27 March 1991 CASES CITED : R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Collie (1991) 56 SASR 302 R v Georgiou (1999) NSWCCA 125 R v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356 R v Patsalis and Spathis (1999) 107 A Crim R 432 Spratt (1982) 8 A Crim R 351 Webb and Hay v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 PARTIES : Appellant - Shane Antoni SYMSS Respondent - Crown FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60305/01 COUNSEL : Appellant - In person Crown - W G Dawe QC SOLICITORS : Appellant - In person Crown - S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70212/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Howie J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60305/01
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate