NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Newcastle City Council v McShane [2004] NSWCA 425 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 October 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Giles JA at 14 DECISION : (1) Grant leave to appeal and direct that the notice of appeal be filed within seven days; (2) Dismiss the appeal; (3) Refuse leave to cross-appeal; (4) Appellant/opponent pay eighty-five per cent of the respondent/claimant's costs of the application for leave to appeal and appeal and the application for leave to cross-appeal.
CATCHWORDS : PERSONAL INJURY - footbridge in park blocked off by plastic mesh - plaintiff running for train at night - did not see mesh - fell and was injured - whether insufficient illumination - whether fact plaintiff not keeping proper lookout meant no duty of care - hazard created when defendant could have used more visible means of blocking footbridge - was duty of care - breach of duty of care - CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE - whether finding of contributory negligence open - DAMAGES - claim to buffer because injury could disadvantage plaintiff on open labour market - whether prospect of pecuniary loss from disadvantage established - no buffer. D Boroondara City Council v Cattanach [2004] VSCA 139; Borough of Bathurst v Macpherson (1879) LR 4 App Cas 256; Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; Burwood Council v Byrnes [2002] NSWCA 343; Byrnes v Burwood Council [2003] HCA Trans 462; Fisher v Ruislip-Northwood Urban District Council [1945] KB 58; Greater Shepparton City Council v Davis [2004] VSCA 140; Junkovic v Neindorf [2004] SASC 235; K Mart Australia Ltd v McCann [2004] NSWCA 283; MacArthur Districts Motor Cycle Sportsmen Inc v Ardizzone [2004] NSWCA 145; McClelland v Manchester Corporation [1912] 1 KB 118; CASES CITED : Meurs v Taieri County (1954) NZLR 1081; Municipality of Pictou v Geldert [1893] AC 524; Newcastle City Council v Lindsay [2004] NSWCA 198; Nominal Defendant v Lane [2004] NSWCA 405; Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201; Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALJR; 492 Richmond Valley Council v Standing (2002) 126 LGERA 237; State of New South Wales v Moss (2000) 54 NSWLR 536; Stoddard v Ashburton County [1926] NZLR 399; Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236; Webb v South Australia (1982) 56 ALJR 912; Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40. PARTIES : Newcastle City Council - Appellant Travis McShane - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40009/04 COUNSEL : P Garling SC & K Morgan - Appellant M Williams SC & G Beauchamp - Respondent SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox - Appellant Carroll & O'Dea - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate