NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Niass [2004] NSWCCA 149 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/05/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Levine J at 2; Hidden J at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Crown appeal - break enter and steal - suspended sentence - delay - prospects of rehabilitation - whether sentence inadequate Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 R v Blanco (1999) 106 ACrimR 303 R v Hayes [2001] NSWCCA 358 CASES CITED : R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 PARTIES : Regina - Applicant Barry John Niass - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60035/04 COUNSEL : G Rowling - Crown H Dhanji - Respondent SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown SE O'Connor - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/0119 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Payne DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60035/04
HODGSON JA LEVINE J HIDDEN J
Friday 14 May 2004
Regina v Barry John Niass Judgment 1 HODGSON JA: I agree with Hidden J. 2 LEVINE J: I agree with Hidden J. 3 HIDDEN J: After a trial at the Parramatta District Court before Payne DCJ and a jury, the respondent, Barry John Niass, was found guilty of a charge of break enter and steal: an offence under s112(1) of the Crimes Act, carrying a maximum penalty of fourteen years imprisonment. When he appeared for sentence he asked her Honour to take into account an offence of possessing a prohibited drug, arising from the fact that the police who arrested him in respect of the major offence found a small quantity of amphetamine in his possession. Taking that matter into account, her Honour sentenced him to imprisonment for two years with a non-parole period of fifteen months, but suspended that sentence under s12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act upon his entering into a bond to be of good behaviour for the period of the sentence. Pursuant to s5D of the Criminal Appeal Act, the Director of Public Prosecutions appeals against that sentence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate