NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Coshott & Anor v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2004] NSWCA 189 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Stein AJA at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Construction of contractual arrangements- whether representations by respondent concerning duration of Bills Discount Facility- alleged breach of agreement concerning interest rate- whether respondent entitled to charge limit excess overdraft rates and debit appellants' account- onus of proof- finding against weight of evidence PARTIES : Robert Gilbert Coshott and Ljiljana Coshott - Appellants Commonwealth Bank of Australia- Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40863/03 COUNSEL : Mr G Laughton SC/ Mr C Wilson for the Appellants Mr A.G. Bell SC for the Respondent SOLICITORS : Hill Ryner & Company for the Appellants J K O'Sullivan for the Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 1643/96 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sorby DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 6 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40863/03 DC 1643/96
SHELLER JA IPP JA STEIN AJA
17 June 2004 ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT and LJILJANA COSHOTT v COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA Judgment 1 SHELLER JA: I agree with Stein AJA 2 IPP JA: I agree with Stein AJA 3 STEIN AJA:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate