NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) 13 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-612
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : MERCANTILE MUTUAL INSURANCE (NSW WORKERS COMPENSATION) LTD v MURRAY [2004] NSWCA 151 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Handley JA at 72; Brownie AJA at 73 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Order of the District Court is set aside. Documents produced to the Court to be returned to the appellant; 3. Liberty to apply within six weeks in relation to the costs orders concerning the abortive hearing in the District Court in November 2002; 4. Respondent to pay appellant's costs of the appeal and to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if qualified.
CATCHWORDS : Insurance - legal professional privilege - joint privilege - common interest privilege - fiduciary duties - whether solicitor-client relationship formed between insured and insurer-appointed lawyer - whether privilege could operate between insured and insurer - claims assessor's report - whether privileged and whether privilege belonged to insurer and/or insured. (D) Workers Compensation Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss118, 119, 122(5), 138 District Court Rules, Pt 28 r18(2)). ACN 007 838 584 Pty Ltd v Zurich Australian Insurance Ltd (1997) 69 SASR 374 Brown v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance plc [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 325 Bulk Materials (Coal Handling) Services Pty Ltd v Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd (1988) 13 NSWLR 689 C I & D Industries Pty Ltd v Keeling, NSWSC, unreported, Abadee J, 26 March 1997 Esso Australian Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 201 CLR 49 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v ACN 010 087 573 Pty Ltd [2000] 11 ANZ Ins Cas 61-464 Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 CASES CITED : Garry F S Boyce t/as Hunt and Hunt Lawyers v Goodyear Australia Ltd, NSWCA unreported, 16 September 1996 Groom v Crocker [1939] 1 KB 194 Kennedy v Cynstock Pty Ltd (1993) 3 NTLR 108 Marshall v Adamson [1936] 4 DLR 383 Nicholson & Ors v Icepak Coolstores Ltd [1999] 3 NZLR 475 Re Konigsberg (a bankrupt), ex parte the Trustee v Konigsberg [1989] 3 All ER 289 State Government Insurance Commission (SA) v Paneros (1988) 48 SASR 349. TSB Bank plc v Robert Irving & Burns (a firm) (Colonial Baltica Insurance Ltd, third party) [2000] 2 All ER 826 Verson Cleaning International v Ward (1996) 9 ANZ Ins Cas 61-352 PARTIES : Mercantile Mutual Insurance (NSW Workers Compensation) Ltd (Appellant) Phillip Reginald Murray (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40111/03 COUNSEL : J D Hislop QC/N A Confos (Appellant) M J Joseph/D Stanton (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Moray & Agnew (Appellant) Gells (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate