NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : TUCKER & ANOR v ECHO PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 554 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : 1. I decline orders 1 - 3 in the amended notice of motion.; 2. The defendant has leave to amend contextual imputation 7(a)(ii) in accordance with paragraph [21] of these reasons.; 3. I order the defendants to provide further and better particulars, within 21 days of today, of their case under s16 with respect to contextual imputations 7(a)(iv), (v), (vi) and (vii).; 4. The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants costs of the hearing of the motion.; 5. I place the matter in the Registrar's Defamation Directions List on 11 July 2003.
CATCHWORDS : Admission on pleading - leave to withdraw - comment - altrenative defences - s16 defence - contextual imputations vis-à-vis failed plaintiff's imputations - s7A(4)(a) Defamation Act LEGISLATION CITED : s 7A Defamation Act 1974 Casey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1981) 1 NSWLR 305 Fidelitas Shipping Co Ltd v V/O Exportchleb [1991] 1 QB 630 Haines v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 43 NSWLR 404 CASES CITED : Hepburn v TCN Channel Nine [1984] 1 NSWLR 386 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Blake; David Syme & Co Ltd v Blake (2001) 53 NSWLR 541 McBride v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2000] NSWSC 747 O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 232 Whelan & Anor v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1028 ROSS TUCKER (First plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate