NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Johnston [2004] NSWCCA 58 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; James J at 2; Whealy J at 245 DECISION : Leave to withdraw abandonment of appeal against conviction refused
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against conviction for murder - notice of abandonment of appeal - application for leave to withdraw notice of abandonment - evidence by person who might reasonably be supposed to have been criminally concerned - Evidence Act s 165(1)(d) - evidence by co-accused - prior consistent statement - Evidence Act s 108(3) - admissions made while in custody - separate trials - right to silence - hearsay evidence - Evidence Act s 165(1)(a) - whether manslaughter verdict available - evidence of prisoner informer - cross-examination of accused LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207 McKinney v The Queen (1990-1991) 171 CLR 468 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 Pollitt v The Queen (1991-1992) 174 CLR 558 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 R v Clark [2003] NSWCCA 308 R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 CASES CITED : R v Henning (unreported CCA 11 May 1990) R v Middis (unreported 27 March 1991) R v Ngo [2003] NSWCCA 82 R v Patsalis and Spathis (1997) 107 A CrimR 432 R v Symss [2003] NSWCCA 77 R v Stewart [2001] NSWCAA 260 Stanoevski v The Queen (2001) 202 CLR 115 Webb v The Queen (1993-1994) 181 CLR 41 Webb and Hay v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 PARTIES : Regina v Mark Anthony Johnston FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60250/02 COUNSEL : P Boulten SC/ S Torpey - Applicant D Howard - Crown SOLICITORS : J North - Applicant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate