NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 145 A Crim R 27
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Rima [2003] NSWCCA 405 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 75; Hidden J at 76 DECISION : 1. The trial judge's ruling as to Mr Sweeny's identification evidence be vacated; 2. Order that the Crown be permitted to lead evidence from Mr Sweeny on the issue of identification; 3. The respondent be granted a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - Application for exclusion of identification evidence under s137 of the Evidence Act - Whether admission of identification evidence would lead to an impermissible process of reasoning on the part of the jury - Whether probative value of evidence outweighed by prejudice Evidence Act 1995, s137 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s5F(2) Suitors Fund Act, s6(2) R v Lisoff [1999] NSWCCA 364 R v Matovski (1989) 15 NSWLR 720 R v Alexandroaia (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 R v Beeby [1999] 104 A Crim R 142 Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 190 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 R v Tugaga (1994) 74 A Crim R 190 Marshall (2000) 113 A Crim R 190 Mezzo [1986] 1 SCR 802 R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 Alexander v The Queen (1981) 145 CLR 395 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 397 PARTIES : Regina Mohamed Rima FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60366/03 COUNSEL : A: D. Arnott R: C K Smith SOLICITORS : A: R: S E O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate