NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v CRAMP [2004] NSWCCA 264 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1,75; Hidden J at 73; Buddin J at 74 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal against severity of sentence - Size of adjustment to statutory ratio where there are special circumstances - Power to correct technical error in sentencing - Aggravating factors not to be counted if an element of the offence Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Hansen [2002] NSWCCA 321 CASES CITED : R v Mako [2004] NSWCCA 90 R v Weininger (2003) 212 CLR 629 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Piccin No 2 [2002] NSWCCA 323 R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Sharma (2002) 54 NSWLR 300 PARTIES : Regina Gordon Reginald Cramp FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60122/04 COUNSEL : Ms H Cox (Applicant) Dr P Power SC (Crown) SOLICITORS : S O'Connor (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Crown)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/21/1006 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Knight DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 10 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60122/04
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate