NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Commonwealth of Australia v Elliott [2004] NSWCA 360 revised - 5/11/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 90; Tobias JA at 91 DECISION : (1) Appeal allowed in part; (2) Set aside the judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $1,448,271.67; (3) In lieu thereof, judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for such sum as the parties shall advise the Registrar as a result of their calculations in accordance with these reasons, such advce to be given within 14 days; (4) Liberty to apply in the event of disagreement over calculation of the substituted judgment, application to be made in the first instance by telephone to the Associate of Giles JA; (5) No order as to the costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS : Negligence - injury to knee - increased risk from directed task - whether causation could be found - causation properly found - damages - whether pre-existing condition- question of fact - judge misapprehended evidence - increased susceptability to injury - reconciliation of Watts v Rake and Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd - need for greater allowance for contingencies - differential allowances - allowances increased. D Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare (1992) 176 CLR 408; Betts v Whittingslowe (1947) 71 CLR 649; Chappell v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232; E M Baldwin & Son Pty Ltd v Plane (1999) Aust Torts Rep 81-499; Cook On Gas Products Pty Ltd v Kelly (1998) 29 MVR 415; Groves v The Commonwealth (1982) 150 CLR 113; Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; CASES CITED : Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269; Overland Sydney Pty Ltd v Piatti (1992) Aust Torts Reps 81-191; Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164; Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuinness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158; Waverley v Bloom (1999) Aust Torts Rep 81-517; Wilson v Peisley (1975) 50 ALJR 207; Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40. PARTIES : Commonwealth of Australia - Appellant Craig Andrew Elliott - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41195/03 COUNSEL : R E Williams QC & B Skinner - Appellant H Shore SC - Respondent SOLICITORS : Australian Government Solicitor, Sydney - Appellant Thomas & Company, Sydney - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate