NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Bulut [2004] NSWCCA 325 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/09/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1, 24, 26; Barr J at 25; Hoeben J at 2 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : SENTENCING: Administering stupefying drug with intent to steal - s38 Crimes Act, 1900. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act, 1900 CASES CITED : R v Harrison (1997) 93 A Crim R 314 at 320 R v Dawson [2000] NSWCCA 399 at [54] PARTIES : Sayut Bulut - Applicant Crown - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1812 COUNSEL : J Conomos - Applicant D Woodburne - Crown SOLICITORS : Tsambas & Co - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/11/0688 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Solomon DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/1812 (60289/04)
SPIGELMAN CJ BARR J HOEBEN J
Monday, 20 September, 2004 REGINA v Sayut BULUT Judgment 1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I invite Justice Hoeben to give the first judgment. 2 HOEBEN J: On 6 May 2003 the applicant, Sayut Bulut, was indicted before his Honour Judge Solomon in the District Court at Sydney on the following two charges, committed on 7 January 2002:
Count 1: Administer stupefying drug to commit an indictable offence (stealing) in contravention of s38 of the Crimes Act 1900 for which the prescribed maximum penalty is imprisonment for 25 years; and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate