NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v. Lumsden [2003] NSWCCA 83 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Hulme J at 12; Smart AJ at 61 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Admission of identification evidence of Sgt Rayner and directions as to that evidence not erroneous - admissibility of evidence of drugs found at applicant's premises 2 months after offence - directions not inadequate - cross-examination by Crown of defence witness did not breach the credibility rule as matters had substantial probative value Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Domican v The Queen (1991-1992) 173 CLR 555 Attorney General v Willessee [1980] 2 NSWLR 143 Hinch v The Queen (1987) 164 CLR 15 Markby v R (1978) 140 CLR 108 CASES CITED : R v Andrews [2003] NSWCCA 7 R v AB [2001] NSWCCA 496 R v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83 R v Glennon (1982) 173 CLR 592 R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 R v Taouk, R v Hanna [1982] 2 NSWLR 974 PARTIES : Regina Christine Lumsden FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60162/2002 COUNSEL : Appellant: P. G. Berman S. C Respondent: P. Barrett SOLICITORS : Appellant: D. J. Humphreys Respondent: S. E. O'Connor
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/61/0131 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Shillington DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate