NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Optus Vision P/L v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & 5 Ors [2004] NSWCA 61 HEARING DATE(S) : 05/02/04, 10/02/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Stein AJA at 117 DECISION : 1. The appeal be allowed; 2. The respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and at first instance; 3. Judgment for the appellant in the sum of $2.5 million.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - INTERPRETATION - Context in form of interconnected agreements does not overrule primary text in absence of ambiguity or anomaly - context can be ambiguous or itself give rise to anomaly - effect of this on construction - text of contract the primary source and starting point for interpretation - construction of contract to avoid absurd or unreasonable result frustrating commercial purpose of contract - party bound in all its capacities and does not escape obligation by acting as a partner - meaning of sponsorship and exclusivity. LEGISLATION CITED : Partnership Act 1892 (NSW) Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society (1998) 1 WLR 896 Maggbury Pty Limited v Hafele Australia Pty Limited (2001) 76 ALJR 246 at 248 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney Council (2002) 186 ALR 289 at 292-3 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 at 352-3 B & B Constructions (Australia) Pty Ltd v Brian A Cheeseman & Associates Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 227 CASES CITED : Kingston v Keprose Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 at 421 Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 State Bank of New South Wales v Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia (1984) 154 CLR 579 Shoshana Pty Ltd & Anor v 10th Cantanae Pty Ltd & Ors (1988) 14 FCR 285 at 286 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corp (1984) 156 CLR 41 Transfield Pty Ltd v Arlo International Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 83 Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 2 NSWLR 310 at 313 Optus Vision Pty Limited (ACN 066 518 821) PARTIES : v Asutralian Rugby Football League Limite (ACN 003 107 293) & 5 Ors FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40400 of 2003 COUNSEL : Apellant: I M Jackman SC Respondents: A Sullivan QC & A S Bell SOLICITORS : Apellant: Baker & McKenzie Respondents: Blake Dawson Waldron
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate