NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : James v Hill [2004] NSWCA 301 revised - 22/09/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Tobias JA at 3 DECISION : (a) Appeal of the first appellant allowed in part; (b) Appeal of the second appellant dismissed; (c) Set aside Order 1 made by Bergin J on 26 February 2004; (d) The respondent pay 60% of the first appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 if otherwise qualified; (e) The first cross-appeal be dismissed; (f) The cross-appellant pay the first cross-respondent's costs of the first cross-appeal; (g) The second cross-appeal be dismissed; (h) The cross-appellants pay the cross-respondent's costs of the second cross-appeal
CATCHWORDS : Contracts - Election - Seeking specific performance - Damages - Exemplary damages - Victim's own wrongdoing - Un-associated third party - Analogy to 'clean hands' - Mitigation - Damages - Exemplary damages - Solicitor assists wrongdoer - Reprehensibility of conduct - Increased when occurs in legal practice - Professional disciplinary hearing - Double punishment - Equity - Relief against forfeiture - Deposit - Unconscionable conduct - Connection and causation - Whether penalty LEGISLATION CITED : Nil Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998) 196 CLR 1 Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1 Ciavarella v Balmer (1983) 153 CLR 438 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauci [2003] 77 ALJR 1853 CASES CITED : Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd (2003) 77 ALJR 1882 Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil Australia Pty Ltd (1985) 155 CLR 448 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Limited (2003) 56 NSWLR 298 Dewhirst v Edwards [1983] 1NSWLR 34 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (No 2) (2003) 57 NSWCA 338 David Anthony James PARTIES : David George Brooks Terry Donald Hill FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40170/04 COUNSEL : A: C R C Newlinds SC / D A Allen R: M R Aldridge SC / R Glasson SOLICITORS : A: Catalyst Partners, Newcastle R: Eddy & Moloney, Paddington
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate