NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. SAMPSON [2003] NSWCCA 66 HEARING DATE(S) : Tuesday 19 November 2002; Thursday 5 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 2; Greg James J at 3 DECISION : Verdict and judgment of acquittal entered. Sentence quashed. Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - conviction - appeal - verdict unreasonable or unable to be supported by the evidence - relevant principles. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Chamberlain (No. 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521 M (1994) 181 CLR 487 Martin [2002] NSWCCA 290 Bikic [2002] NSWCCA 227 CASES CITED : Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82 MFA [2002] HCA 53 MacKenzie (1996) 90 A. Crim. R. 468 Jones (1997) 191 CLR 439 Rose [2002] NSWCCA 455 PARTIES : REGINA v. SAMPSON, Brett Herbert FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA No. 60103 of 2002; No. 60269 of 2002 COUNSEL : Crown: D.C. Frearson App: P. Boulten SOLICITORS : Crown: S.E. O'Connor App: J. Bettens & Co.
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/31/0348 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Patten, DCJ. JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 60103 of 2002 No. 60269 of 2002
MEAGHER, JA. WOOD, CJ. at CL. GREG JAMES, J.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate