NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : DAVIS v COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WAGGA WAGGA [2004] NSWCA 34 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 February 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 40; Tobias JA at 41 DECISION : Appeal upheld.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - appellate review - whether bound by trial judge's assessment of credibility - whether assessment of adverse credibility open on the facts - whether prior medical histories inconsistent with witness's evidence at trial - failure to confront plaintiff with alleged inconsistencies - principle in Brown v Dunn. (ND) PARTIES : John Bradley DAVIS v COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WAGGA WAGGA FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40426/03 COUNSEL : Appellant: B Toomey QC / A Black Respondent: P W Taylor SC SOLICITORS : Appellant: Walsh & Blair, Wagga Wagga Respondent: Phillips Fox, Sydney
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT SC 20854/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dunford J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40426 of 2003
MASON P BEAZLEY JA TOBIAS JA
Thursday 26 February 2004
John Bradley DAVIS v THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WAGGA WAGGA
BACKGROUND The appellant severely injured his left arm when he fell or jumped from a swing in Emblen Park, Wagga Wagga. The respondent was sued as the occupier of the park responsible for installing and maintaining the swing.
The appellant's version of the accident was that he noticed that the cross-bar on the swing was shaking and so thinking that it was going to fall, he attempted to jump off. As he attempted to do so, his shorts caught in the S-hook which connected the swing's seat to the chain which extended to the cross-bar. This interrupted his jump and caused him to fall and injure his arm.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate