NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 61 NSWLR 135 147 A Crim R 172
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Narongchai Saengsai-Or [2004] NSWCCA 108 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/4/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Bell J at 3 DECISION : Appeal allowed; New trial ordered
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001 (Cth) He Kaw Teh v R (1985) 157 CLR 523 Krakouer v R [1998] HCA 43; 194 CLR 202 Kural v R (1987) 162 CLR 502 CASES CITED : Longman v R (1989) 168 CLR 79 Pereira v R (1988) 63 ALJR 1 R v Basha (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 R v Clark [2001] NSWCCA 494; 123 A Crim R 506 R v Stewart [2001] NSWCCA 260; 52 NSWLR 301 PARTIES : Narongchai Saengsai-Or (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60001/04 COUNSEL : R Bromwich (Crown) G Farmer (Applicant) SOLICITORS : Cth DPP John Bettens & Co (Applicant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/11/0694 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Twigg DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60001/04
WOOD CJ at CL SIMPSON J BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate