NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v SKAF, GHANEM & HAJEID [2004] NSWCCA 74 revised - 29/04/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 8, 9 and 10 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 1 DECISION : Each appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal appeal - kidnapping and sexual assault in company - separate trial applications - evidence of prior convictions - whether good character had been raised - identification evidence - directions on identification - whether defence submissions unsupported by evidence impacted upon fair trial for co-accused - judicial response thereto - whether warning about unreliability of evidence of co-accused appropriate - directions in relation to failure to testify - whether comment" infringed Evidence Act, s20(2) - whether address of counsel for one defendant caused co-accused's trial to miscarry - whether verdicts unreasonable - evidence that medical examination of complaints was "consistent" with their history of assaults. (D) Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s6 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss20(2), 102, 110, 112, 115, 116, 135, 137, 138, 165(1)(d), s192(2) Justices Act 1902 ss75B, 100AB Adler [2002] NSWCCA 180 Alexander v The Queen (1981) 145 CLR 395 Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50 Chami (2002) 128 A Crim R 428 Chen (2002) 130 A Crim R 300 Clarke (1997) 97 A Crim R 414 Darby v The Queen (1982) 148 CLR 668 Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 77 ALJR 1433, [2003] HCA 40 Domican v. The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207 Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285 Eastman v The Queen (1997) 158 ALR 107 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Gabriel v The Queen (1997) 76 FCR 279 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Pitkin v The Queen (1995) 130 ALR 35 R v Al Khair (NSWCCA 20.6.94 CASES CITED : R v Bartle & Ors [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Clarke (2001) 123 A Crim R 506 R v Cook NSWCCA unrep, 24.8.98 R v Dann [2000] NSWCCA 185 R v Diez-Orozco [2003] NSWSC 1050 R v Eldridge [2002] NSWCCA 205 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Fuller (1994) 34 NSWLR 233 R v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174 R v JGW [1999] NSWCCA 116 R v Nathan Lee NSWCCA, unreported, 5 May 1997 R v Osman, NSWCCA, 10 March 1998 R v Park [2003] NSWCCA 203 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 R v Turner (2000) 76 SASR 163 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620 Verma (1987) 30 A Crim R 441 Webb v The Queen, Hay v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 Weissensteiner v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217 Williams v The Queen (2000) 119 A Crim R 490 PARTIES : Regina Bilal SKAF, Mohamed GHANEM, Belal HAJEID FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60032/02; 60174/03; 60380/02 Crown: D Frearson/ D Arnott COUNSEL : Appellant: (B. Skaf) A Cook Appellant: (M Ghanem) T Game SC/ D Johnson Appellant: (B Hajeid) S Odgers SC/ H Dhangie Crown: S Kavanagh (Director of Public Prosecutions) SOLICITORS : Appellant: (B Skaf) Galloways Solicitors Appellant: (M Ghanem) Murphys Solicitors Appellant: (B Hajeid) Ryan & Bossher
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate