NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brodyn Pty Limited t/as Time Cost and Quality (ACN 001 998 830) v Philip Davenport & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1019 HEARING DATE(S) : 27/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 November 2003
JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Administrative Law List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Proceedings to be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Building and construction - progress payments claimed under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 - determination made by adjudicator - Administrative law - whether, and if so to what extent, judicial review of adjudications made pursuant to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is available - scope of relief available in the nature of a writ of certiorari - grounds upon which judicial review is available Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Home Building Act, 1989 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Abacus Funds Management Ltd v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 935 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 Emag Constructions Pty Limited v Highrise Concrete Contractors (Aust) Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 903 Musico v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 977 Paynter Dixon Constructions Pty Limited v JF & CG Tilston Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 869 CASES CITED : Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 77 ALJR 454 Public Service Board of NSW v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1952] 1 KB 338 R v Tennant; Ex parte Woods [1962] Qd R 241 Walter Construction Group Limited v CPL (Surry Hills) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 266 Vroon BV v Foster's Brewing Group Ltd [1994] 2 VR 32 Brodyn Pty Limited t/as Time Cost and Quality (ACN 001 998 830) (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Philip Davenport (First Defendant) Mediate Today Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Linisil Australia Pty Ltd. (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30078/03 COUNSEL : Mr T Davie (Plaintiff) Mr F Hicks (Third Defendant) SOLICITORS : Schrader & Associates (Plaintiff) LAC Lawyers (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate