NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rocco Triulcio v Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 311 revised - 27/04/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 05/04/04, 06/04/04, 07/04/04, 08/04/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Winding up orders to be made. Cross claim for compulsory acquisition of plaintiff's shares dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - Winding Up - Quasi-partnerships - Solvent company group owning properties put out on lease - Breakdown of mutual confidence - Whether compulsory acquisition of plaintiff's shares and alternative remedy to winding up on just and equitable ground - Whether plaintiff oppressed the majority - Unaudited accounts containing incorrect entries - Inability to audit loan accounts - Cash missing LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360 Alessi v The Original Australian Art Co Pty Ltd (1989) 7 ACLC 595 Stapp v Surge Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 17 ACLC 896 International Hospitality Concepts Pty Ltd v National Marketing Concepts Inc (No 2) (1994) 13 ACSR 368 Wallington v Kokotovich Constructions Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACLC 1207 Kokotovich Constructions Pty Ltd v Wallington (1995) 13 ACLC 1113 Alati v Wei Sheung (2000) 34 ACSR 489 CASES CITED : Re Johnson Corporation Ltd (1980) 5 ACLR 227 McPherson 173 n 304 and Host-Plus Pty Ltd v Australian Hotels Association [2003] VSC 145 Bernhardt v Beau Rivage Pty Ltd (1989) 15 ACLR 160 Re Dalkeith Investments Pty Ltd (1984) 9 ACLR 247 Mincom Pty Ltd v Murphy [1983] 1 Qd R 297 Re Brylyn No 2 Pty Ltd (1987) 12 ACLR 697 Malos v Malos (2003) 44 ACSR 511 Watson v James [1999] NSWSC 600 McPherson, The Law of Company Liquidation, 4th ed, LBC Information Services, Sydney, 1999 Rocco Triulcio - Plaintiff/ First Cross Defendant Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd - First Defendant/ First Cross Claimant Chase (No. 1) Property Investments Pty Ltd - Second Defendant/ Second Cross Claimant Chase (No. 2) Property Investments Pty Ltd - Third Defendant/ Third Cross Claimant Chase (No. 3) Property Investments Pty Ltd - Fourth Defendant/ Fourth Cross Claimant M.T. Management Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant/ Fifth Cross Claimant Rombade Pty Ltd - Sixth Defendant/ Sixth Cross Claimant Get'm Pty Ltd - Seventh Defendant/ Seventh Cross Claimant PARTIES : Sant Victoria Pty Ltd - Eighth Defendant/ Eighth Cross Claimant Mancinis Victoria Pty Ltd - Ninth Defendant/ Ninth Cross Claimant Bakaras Australia Pty Ltd - Tenth Defendant/ Tenth Cross Claimant Anthony Stephen Elias - Second Cross Defendant Bartholemew James Elias - Third Cross Defendant Daniel Joseph Elias - Fourth Cross Defendant Gregory David Elias - Fifth Cross Defendant Elias Holdings Pty Ltd - Sixth Cross Defendant Carmelo Antonio Giorgio - Seventh Cross Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3778/03 COUNSEL : Mr V R W Gray - Plaintiff/1st Cross Defendant Mr C R C Newlinds SC/ Mr D A Smallbone - 1st to 10th Defendants/ 1st to 10th Cross Claimants Abbott Tout Solicitors - Plaintiff/1st Cross Defendant SOLICITORS : John de Mestre & Co Solicitors - 1st to 10th Defendants/ 1st to 10th Cross Claimants David M Carson Solicitor - 2nd to 7th Cross Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate