NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Eden Constructions v State of New South Wales [2004] NSWSC 410 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1 DECISION : Paragraphs [24]-[27],[41],[42]
CATCHWORDS : CROSS-VESTING - notice of motion seeking order under s 6(3) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) - where special federal matter and non special federal matter claims pleaded - attraction of non federal jurisdiction to a case involving the exercise of federal jurisdiction - where all aspects of the plaintiff's claim arise from common factual matrix - whether claims other than the special federal matter within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court - whether "special reasons" why matter should be heard in Supreme Court - relevance of specialist Technology and Construction List - COSTS - where defendant neither opposed nor consented to making of order under s 6(3) - whether costs should follow the event Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 457 CASES CITED : Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 559 Matland Holdings Pty Ltd v NTZ Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1590 PARTIES : Eden Constructions Pty Limited (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55025/03 COUNSEL : C Ward (for plaintiff) G Curtin (for defendant) SOLICITORS : Johninfo Lawyers (for plaintiff) Crown Solicitors Office (for defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate