NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NAB v Garry & anor [2003] NSWSC 22 revised - 13/02/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/02/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J DECISION : Witness determined to be an expert able to express opinions on the subject matters objected to.
CATCHWORDS : Evidence - Expert - Ambit of expertise - Opinion evidence - Comparison between the rule of admissibility of opinion evidence under the common law and under the Evidence Act, 1995. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995: s 79, 135 Carter v Boehm 1 Smiths Leading Cases 7th Ed. (1876) 577 CASES CITED : Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486 Makita Australia Pty Ltd v Sproule (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 HG v the Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 National Australia Bank PARTIES : John Joseph Phillip Garry and Marilyn Gail Garry Elders Limited John Davis and others FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12479/98 Plaintiff and first cross defendant - Mr D Williams COUNSEL : Defendants - Mr R Walker Second cross defendant - Mr J Stevenson Third cross defendant - Mr J Kelly SC with Mr G McNally Plaintiff and first cross defendant - Mr Dale J Kemp: Dibbs, Crowther & Osborne SOLICITORS : Defendants - Mr John Conti: Boyd House & Partners Second cross defendant - Mr Andrew Kingsford Smith: Henry Davis York Third cross defendant - Mr Philip Harris: Harris McHugh Lawyers (Tamworth)
- 4 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate