NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sogelease Australia Ltd & Anor v David James Griffin & Ors [2003] NSWSC 178 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 March, 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 March 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Discovery against First Defendant refused; Second Defendant ordered to make further discovery; directions for compliance given.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION - Plaintiffs sue First Defendant for fraudulently misappropriating funds - First Defendant enters no Defence - default judgment entered - Plaintiffs seek discovery against First Defendant for purpose of tracing funds and obtaining account of profits - First Defendant objects to giving discovery on ground that no issue remains between Plaintiffs and First Defendant - other Defendants file Defences. - HELD: Discovery may be ordered at any stage of proceedings in aid of the proper disposition of any issue as to final relief - discovery may be ordered against party if relevant to any issues between party seeking discovery and any other party to proceedings. - DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION - PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION - First Defendant takes "blanket objection" to providing any list of documents on ground of self incrimination - general rule that "blanket objection" impermissible - principles discussed - exceptions to general rule. - HELD: On facts of this case, no discovery at all from First Defendant should be ordered. - DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION - DIRECTIONS - CONTEMPT - Discovery sought from Second Defendant, First Defendant's wife - Second Defendant does not claim privilege on ground of self incrimination - Second Defendant says that she has given discoverable documents to First Defendant who will not return them for purposes of her discovery - First Defendant refuses to return documents to Second Defendant on ground that to do so will incriminate him - power of Court to make directions under s.76A Supreme Court Act. - HELD: Documents of Second Defendant still in her "power" - Second Defendant has not discharged her obligation to give discovery - direction to Second Defendant to procure documents from First Defendant - direction to First Defendant to provide Second Defendant's documents to her for purpose of discovery - First Defendant has no claim to privilege against self incrimination in respect of documents of Second Defendant - contempt consequences if directions disobeyed. - DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION - PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF INCRIMINATION - JOINTLY OWNED DOCUMENTS. Held: A party must discover and produce for inspection documents within the party's possession, custody or power regardless of whether that party owns or controls the documents solely or jointly with another - Second Defendant required to discover and produce documents owned jointly with First Defendant. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) - s.76A Supreme Court Rules - Pt 17 r9, Pt 23 r3, Pt 36 r12, Pt 36 r16. - Accident Insurance Mutual Holdings Ltd v McFadden (1993) 31 NSWLR 412 - Aetna Pacific Securities Ltd v Hong Kong Bank of Australia Ltd (unrep., NSWSC 29 April, 1993; BC9301701) - Attorney-General v North Metropolitan Tramways Co [1892] 3 Ch 70 - Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (unrep., Federal Court 21 February 1990 per Foster J; BC9003178) - C v National Crime Authority (1987) 78 ALR 338 - Chantrey Martin & Co v Martin [1953] 2 QB 286 - Coomes & Son v Hayward [1913] 1 KB 150 - Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd v Customs & Excise Commissioners (No 2) [1974] AC 405 - EMI (Australia) Ltd v Bay Imports Pty Ltd [1980] FSR Vol 6 - Gollin Holdings Limited v Adcock [1981] 1 NSWLR 691 CASES CITED : - Kearsley v Philips (1882) 10 QBD 36 - Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 627 - McLean v Burns Philp Trustee Co Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 623 - Palmdale Insurance Ltd (in liq) v L. Grollo & Co Pty Ltd [1987] VR 113 - R v Associated Northern Collieries (1910) 11 CLR 738 - Sorby v Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 - Spokes v Grosvenor Hotel Co [1897] 2 QB 124 - Theodore v Australian Postal Commission [1988] VR 272 - Turner v Davies [1981] 2 NSWLR 324 - Vasil v National Australia Bank Ltd (1999) 46 NSWLR 207 - Bray on Discovery (1885) Sogelease Australia Limited - First Plaintiff SG Australia Ltd (formerly Society Generale Australia Ltd) - Second Plaintiff David James Griffin - First Defendant Maree Leigh Griffin - Second Defendant PARTIES : Michael Sullivan - Third Defendant Cindy Sullivan - Fourth Defendant Sportingbet Australia Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant Donald Harry (t/a Number One Betting Shop Agents) - Sixth Defendant Number One Betting Shop Limited - Seventh Defendant Iasbet.com Pty Ltd - Eighth Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2105/02 G.C. Lindsay SC, A.S. McGrath - First and Second Plaintiffs A.S. Street SC - First Defendant COUNSEL : P.H. Blackburn-Hart - Second Defendant K.L. Andronos - 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th Defendants N. Manousaridis - Eighth Defendant Piper Alderman - First and Second Plaintiffs North & Badgery - First Defendant SOLICITORS : Watts McCray - Second Defendant MWA Lawyers Pty Ltd - 3rd, 4th, 5th and 7th Defendants Corrs Chambers Westgarth - Eighth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate