NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : New South Wales Crime Commission v Le and Luu [2003] NSWSC 494 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1 DECISION : Plaintiff's Notice of Motion for summary judgment dismissed; Costs of Notice of Motion be costs in proceedings instituted on 17 October 2000 and continued by Third Amended Summons filed on 22 November 2000; Order against first defendant pursuant to par 7 of Third Amended Summons; Order against second defendant pursuant to par 9 of the Third Amended Summons; Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of Summons proceedings; Plaintiff to apply to Common Law List Judge not later than 28 days from today for directions as to the implementation of orders 3 and 4 above.
LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) Drug Misue & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Reg v Beck [1985] 1 WLR 22 at 28F CASES CITED : Attorney General's Reference (No. 1 of 1975) [1975] QB 773 The Queen v Most (1881) 7 QBD 244 at 258 Reg v Eade [2002] NSWCCA 257 at par 54 New South Wales Crime Commission PARTIES : Van Tuyen Le Hong Viet Luu FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12714/00 COUNSEL : I. Temby QC - Plaintiff M. Buscombe - Defendants SOLICITORS : J. M. Giorgiutti - NSWCC Mark Klees & Assoc. - Defendants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
SULLY J
11 June 2003
12714/00 – NEW SOUTH WALES CRIME COMMISSION v VAN TUYEN LE & HONG VIET LUU
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate