NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Fernance v Simpson [2003] NSWSC 121 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 and 18 December 2002, 12, 13 February 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 March 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1 DECISION : Declarations as to entitlement to rights of way
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - easements - easement by prescription - lost modern grant - 20 years uninterrupted use - ownership in estate of person who died in 1885 - capacity to grant an easement - acquiescence - requirement of knowledge - whether constructive knowledge sufficient - onus of proof Local Government Act 1993, s,700, s710, s713, s715 LEGISLATION CITED : Probate Act 1890 Real Property Act 1900, s14A Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898, s45, s61 Bridle v Ruby [1989] 1 QB 169 Dalton v Angus (1881) 6 App Cas 740 Delohery v Permanent Trustee Company of New South Wales (1904) 1 CLR 283 Diment v N.H. Foot Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 1427 Gangemi v Watson (1994) 7 WAR 505 Hamilton v Joyce [1984] 3 NSWLR 279 Palk v Shinner (1852) 18 QB 568 CASES CITED : Pugh v Savage [1970] 2 QB 373 Tehidy Minerals Limited v Norman [1971] QB 552 Union Lighterage Co v London Graving Dock Co [1902] 2 Ch 557 Cheshire & Burns Modern Law of Property 15th Ed p543 Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Vol 50 p356; Vol 53 p261 Gale on Easements 16th Ed para 4-79 et seq Jackson on The Law of Easements and Profits p113 Megarry & Wade, The Law of Real Property, 3rd Ed 1966 at 837; 6th Ed p1118 Robert John Fernance and Christine Fernance (First Plaintiffs) Hugh Gordon Randall and Anne Randall (Second Plaintiffs) PARTIES : Kristine Robin Hansen (Third Plaintiff) Damien James Simpson and Robyn Anne Simpson (First Defendants) McKenzie Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Registrar-General of New South Wales (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2135 of 2001 Mr P Brereton SC with him Mr R J Brender (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : Mrs S Foda (First Defendants) Mr R J Powell (Second Defendant) Submitting appearance (Third Defendant) Trisley Kilmurray (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : C N Ingham & Associates (First Defendants) McDonald Johnson (Second Defendant) K C Hall (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate