NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Cheney [2004] NSWSC 104 HEARING DATE(S) : N/A JUDGMENT DATE : 10 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J at 1 DECISION : Petition Dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Application pursuant to s474D of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) - Inquiry into conviction - Fresh evidence - DNA evidence LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s474D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Application by Robert Scott Havell, Buddin J, 9 December 2003 Cheney v The Queen S286/2000 (14 December 2001) Douglas Harry Rendell (1987) 32 A Crim R 243 CASES CITED : R v Button [2001] QCA 133 R v Cheney [1999] NSWCCA 312 R v Garry Andrew Bayliss [2001] NSWSC 732; 124 A Crim R 362 R v Sing (2001) 545 NSWLR 31 Varley v Attorney-General [1978] 8 NSWLR 30 PARTIES : Regina (Respondent) Roger David Cheney (Applicant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70047/2003 COUNSEL : N/A SOLICITORS : Applicant - Self Represented Respondent - Crown Solicitor's Office
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION CRIMINAL LIST
Shaw J 10 March 2004
70047 of 2003
Regina
v
Roger David Cheney: Application Pursuant to 474D of the Crimes Act
JUDGMENT 1 Shaw J: Mr Roger David Cheney, who is incarcerated at Goulburn, has brought a petition to this Court which requires a judge to consider the terms of s 474D of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and to exercise a discretion pursuant to that section. The applicant seeks an inquiry in relation to his conviction before his Honour Judge Kirkham and a jury on 8 June 1995 at the Coffs Harbour District Court. 2 An appellate review before the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal led to variation of the sentence on a number of counts although the appeal against conviction was dismissed by judgment of that Court delivered on 7 October 1999: R v Cheney [1999] NSWCCA 312 per Newman J, with whom Spigelman CJ and Sully J agreed. There was then an unsuccessful application for special leave to appeal to the High Court from parts of the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal: Cheney v The Queen S286/2000 (14 December 2001) per Gleeson CJ and Callinan J.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate