NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 147 A Crim R 385
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Prasad [2004] NSWCCA 293 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/7/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Hidden J at 43; Smart AJ at 44 DECISION : Appeal Dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - importation of commercial quantity of ecstasy - s 233B(1)(d) Customs Act 1901 (Commonwealth) - whether sentence inadequate. LEGISLATION CITED : Customs Act 1901 (Commonwealth) - s 233B(1)(d) Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth) Cranssen v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 509 Olbrich v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Allpass [1994] 72 A Crim R 561 R v Benais [1999] NSWCCA 236 R v Bimahendali (1999) 109 A Crim R 355 R v Budiman (1998) 102 A Crim 411 R v Ceissman [2001] NSWCCA 73 R v Chan [2002] 128 A Crim R 119 R v Dujeu [2004] NSWCCA 237 R v El-Hani [2004] NSWCCA 162 CASES CITED : R v Gutteriez [2004] NSWCCA 22 R v Hayes [1987] 29 A Crim R 452 R v Howland [1999] NSWCCA 10 R v Kevenaar [2004] NSWCCA 210 R v Mas Rivadavia [2004] NSWCCA 284 R v Rose NSWCCA 23 May 1996 R v Simon [2003] NSWCCA 147 R v Shepherd [2003] NSWCCA 287 R v Studenikin [2004] NSWCCA 164 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 Wong and Leung v The Queen (2002) 185 ALR 233 PARTIES : Regina Simon Sunil Prasad FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60015/04 COUNSEL : R Sutherland SC (Crown) S Odgers SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions HardinLaw
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate