NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Maclean v Registrar-General [2003] NSWSC 904 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 October 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1 DECISION : Compensation order made.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - claim under Torrens Assurance Fund - plaintiff purchased property in 1988 - resumption in effect from 1972 - when plaintiff purchased property no notation indicating resumption - plaintiff became aware of resumption after commencing a development of property - claim for wasted costs and additional costs LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900, Part 14, CASES CITED : Registrar of Titles v Spencer (1909) 9 CLR 641 PARTIES : Janet Christine Maclean and Randross Investments Pty Limited (Plaintiffs) Registrar-General (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4918 of 2001 COUNSEL : Mr T Hale, SC with him Mr J Kildea (Plaintiff) Mr I Wales, SC (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Ward Maxwell & Co (Plaintiff) K C Hall (Defendant)
- 8 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
WINDEYER J
FRIDAY 3 OCTOBER 2003
4918/01 MACLEAN & ANOR V REGISTRAR-GENERAL
JUDGMENT 1 The Plaintiffs, Mrs Maclean and Randross Investments Pty Ltd ("Randross") commenced proceedings in this Court on 8 October 2001 by way of Statement of Claim. They seek compensation under Part 14 of the Real Property Act 1900 for loss and damage they say they suffered because a resumption in 1972 of part of the land in folio identifier C/363484, which is situated at 285 Boomerang Drive, Pacific Palms ("the Property"), was not recorded on the Register when Mrs Maclean became the registered proprietor in 1988.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate